Accessibility Tools

  • Content scaling 100%
  • Font size 100%
  • Line height 100%
  • Letter spacing 100%
Grant Bailey reviews Rough Justice: Unanswered questions from the Australian courts by Robin Bowles
Free Article: No
Review Article: Yes
Show Author Link: Yes
Article Title: Rough Justice
Online Only: No
Custom Highlight Text:

This review of some contentious criminal cases in Australia over the last thirty years purports to demonstrate how the processes of the criminal law may, if mishandled, produce an unsafe conviction. The author has made her own investigations into most of the cases. She outlines her own discoveries and compares these to the findings of the police and the courts.

Book 1 Title: Rough Justice
Book 1 Subtitle: Unanswered questions from the Australian courts
Book Author: Robin Bowles
Book 1 Biblio: Five Mile Press $24.95 pb, 258 pp
Book 1 Author Type: Author
Book 1 Cover Small (400 x 600):
Book 1 Cover (800 x 1200):
Display Review Rating: No

Of further concern is the Robin Bowles’s willingness to make suppositions (‘I guessed the police might have been hassling me in their own time, not on official duty’), to conflate fact and opinion (‘my money too was on Denis having thrown her down the hole’) and to rely on statements from unnamed sources (‘One of the police officers in the court foyer during the trial told me …’). Such reliance on speculation and hearsay renders the author’s criticisms of the criminal justice system faintly ridiculous. Indeed, some sections of the book appear pointless when compared to the work of other investigators. The wrongful conviction of John Button, for example, was the subject of Broken Lives (1998), Estelle Blackburn’s Walkley award-winning account of her seven-year investigation into the case. Rough Justice, in comparison to such painstaking investigative work, is roughed over, and will not lead to any acquittals.

Comments powered by CComment