
- Free Article: No
- Contents Category: Fiction
- Custom Article Title: Milly Main reviews 'What Was Left'
- Review Article: Yes
- Article Title: What was left
- Online Only: No
- Custom Highlight Text:
Our instinctual reaction to parents who leave their children is one of suspicion. ‘Child abandonment’ elicits such images as a swaddled foundling in the woods, a parent in a train station losing hold of her child’s hand and disappearing into the crowd, or an anonymous baby hatch in a hospital. The presumption is that a mother (fathers are usually spared this judgement) abandons her child because of some shortcoming: poverty, selfishness, capriciousness. Eleanor Limprecht was prompted to write this novel by a newspaper headline at the time of the birth of her first child when a baby was abandoned at Dandenong Hospital. It asked, ‘How Could She?’
- Book 1 Title: What Was Left
- Book 1 Biblio: Sleepers Publishing, $24.95 pb, 255 pp, 9780987507075
In What Was Left, the author is engaged with this question and with controverting the presumption that mothers who leave their children are deviant or somehow malign. The novel is about a woman pushed to the edge of sanity by her infant, which has become a terrifying parasite in the void left by maternal bond and in the absence of any intellectual or adult stimulation (and sleep). Rachel’s flight abroad is more compelled palliation than abandonment, though she is still tormented by guilt.
The elegant structure of this Bildungsroman incorporates six countries and four sets of parents, Limprecht is in tight control of these narratives – because of their accretive effect, the novel’s ideas flourish. Her handling of metaphor is admirable, such as the decrepit man who ‘looked as though he would shrivel … like a dirty old balloon’. More than a study of post-partum depression, the novel considers how the lives and actions of our parents define us as adults; the Diaspora, expatriation, and not belonging; and a criticism of materialism that is sad but never sententious. It seeks to question characters’ motivations for damaging behaviour. The answer usually lies in the faults of the parent.
Comments powered by CComment